On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:05:38PM GMT, Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is not as easy to support, I thought this would be as "simple" as adding a slice property into user record [1] nowadays. > because currently the hierarchy carries meaning, i.e. to determine if > something belongs to user scope, we check if it's below the user.slice > cgroup and so on. What's an example of user/non-user distinction need? > We could fix this, by stuffing more info in the session scope name, > and this has been on the todo list for a longer time, but so far noone > sat down and implemented this. Didn't you mean cgroup xattrs? Thanks, Michal [1] https://systemd.io/USER_RECORD/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
