On Fr, 07.06.24 08:31, Vladimir Mokrozub (mva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > Uh, LVM is simply nothing anyone here tests, it's not really where the > > future is. Please reproduce with a current systemd version (i.e. 252 > > is two years old, an eternity in Linux), and file a bug, and maybe > > someone with an interest in LVM will look into, but don't hold your breath. > > Sorry for offtopic but why do you say there is no future for LVM? What's > wrong with it? I am pretty sure the future is with multi-device file systems. btrfs, bcachefs (even zfs if it weren't for that license fuckup). Conceptually, faking block device is just a silly approach. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin