On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:32, Reto <reto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:56:31PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote:
> This is what ChatGPT proposes:
Can we like not...
If people want to ask a generative AI they do so on their own.
Let's keep responses based on human interaction shall we, rather than parroting
math models.
Respectfully, I disagree.
Comment on the code itself, or suggest ways to improve it, but don't diss on it just because it was 'generated by AI'
What does the provenance matter? He's got a problem, he's doing some work towards solving it, why bar the submission just because you don't agree with its origins? (sounds familiar...)
