On Mi, 15.03.23 11:43, Stephan Bergmann (sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 15/03/2023 11:29, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Use the elf metadata spec: https://systemd.io/ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA/ > > > > I need to update that, as these days it's no longer necessary to use a > > custom linker script, but with binutils 2.39 (or mold 1.3.0 or lld > > 15.0) it's as easy as passing as a linker flag: > > --package-metadata='{"foo":"bar"}' > > and it will be appended in the right location in the binary. > > systemd-coredump will parse that, and attach it as-is as a > > COREDUMP_PACKAGE_JSON= field in the journal. > > If the json contains fields named 'name' and/or 'version' they will > > also be appended independently as COREDUMP_PACKAGE_NAME= and > > COREDUMP_PACKAGE_VERSION= > > But as I said "many different tests use the same test runner executable". > So I'm not sure how adding ELF metadata to some binary would help me in any > way? For example, two different tests recipes A and B each run python > programs that each spawn a native soffice.bin process, where those > soffice.bin processes don't include any .so that are specific to each test. > If test A fails, its recipe should dump backtraces for all core files caused > by test A, but not for any core files caused by test B. another idea: can't you just wrap your tests in "systemd-run --scope --user --name=somtestid47110815.scope" or so? we pick up unit names in coredump handling. With that you'd run yur tests inside a scope unit, and can then use that as key in logs+coredump. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin