Re: coredumpctl: matching by e.g. env var?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mi, 15.03.23 11:43, Stephan Bergmann (sbergman@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On 15/03/2023 11:29, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Use the elf metadata spec: https://systemd.io/ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA/
> >
> > I need to update that, as these days it's no longer necessary to use a
> > custom linker script, but with binutils 2.39 (or mold 1.3.0 or lld
> > 15.0) it's as easy as passing as a linker flag:
> > --package-metadata='{"foo":"bar"}'
> > and it will be appended in the right location in the binary.
> > systemd-coredump will parse that, and attach it as-is as a
> > COREDUMP_PACKAGE_JSON= field in the journal.
> > If the json contains fields named 'name' and/or 'version' they will
> > also be appended independently as COREDUMP_PACKAGE_NAME= and
> > COREDUMP_PACKAGE_VERSION=
>
> But as I said "many different tests use the same test runner executable".
> So I'm not sure how adding ELF metadata to some binary would help me in any
> way?  For example, two different tests recipes A and B each run python
> programs that each spawn a native soffice.bin process, where those
> soffice.bin processes don't include any .so that are specific to each test.
> If test A fails, its recipe should dump backtraces for all core files caused
> by test A, but not for any core files caused by test B.

another idea: can't you just wrap your tests in "systemd-run --scope
--user --name=somtestid47110815.scope" or so? we pick up unit
names in coredump handling. With that you'd run yur tests inside a
scope unit, and can then use that as key in logs+coredump.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux