Hello, On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 10:11 +0300, juice wrote: > On 4/26/22 09:41, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > Using fingerprint for *authentication* is totally broken concept which > > > should never be allowed. > > Why? Is a PIN any better? > > PIN is much better. You will not be leaving your PIN to any drinking > glass you handle or to doorhandles that you open. People leave > fingerprints all around the place and it has been repeatedly > demonstrated that fingerprints can be easily extracted and replicated to > silicone fingers which can be used to fool fingerprint readers. I expect people here know about the caveats of fingerprints, so I doubt there is a need to explain these basics. I am sure that we could discuss at length in what scenarios the use of fingerprints is beneficial (either by itself or in combination with other methods). But, to be honest, I doubt anyone here is really interested in such a discussion. That said, if you want to start it, you should probably embed your list of caveats into more context and considerations for it to be useful. Benjamin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
