Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Disallowing fingerprint authentication if pam_systemd_home.so needs a password

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/26/22 09:41, Ulrich Windl wrote:

Using fingerprint for *authentication* is totally broken concept which
should never be allowed.
Why? Is a PIN any better?

PIN is much better. You will not be leaving your PIN to any drinking glass you handle or to doorhandles that you open. People leave fingerprints all around the place and it has been repeatedly demonstrated that fingerprints can be easily extracted and replicated to silicone fingers which can be used to fool fingerprint readers.


We leave our fingerprints lying around all the time, and given malicious
enough adversaries they might as well take our fingers too. (I sure would
like to avoid that possibility!!)
So you are saying users leave themselves lying around everywhere? ;-)

People leave fingerprints. Fingerprints can be used to open devices locked by fingerprint. There is also a risk that someone may kill you and cut off your finger.


Fingerprints can be used on place of username, that is OK and does not
present similar risks.
Fingerprints are mote than a userid IMHO.

Fingerprint is exactly that, it is user identification. The police have been using fingerprints now 130 years for identifying people. Some misguided fools have been trying to use fingerprints as substitute for phone unlock PIN for maybe 10 years or so.

  - juice -





[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux