On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 11:30 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Imagine two parallel instances of systemd-udevd (IMO there are > > reasons > > to handle it like a "root storage daemon" in some distant future). > > Hmm, wa? naahh.. udev is about dicovery it should not be required to > maintain access to something you found. True. But if udev ran without interruption, we could get rid of coldplug after switching root. That could possibly save us a lot of trouble. Anyway, it's just a thought I find tempting. Regrads Martin _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel