Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Journald retaining logs for only 10 days

[Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mo, 16.11.20 00:53, Vito Caputo (vcaputo@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:43:27AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@xxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Interesting dicussion, here is one more view point. Few months back we tried to
> > limit systemd journald output to retain a few MB of logs on embedded,
> > headless boxes on a tiny read-write partition in case something goes horribly wrong
> > on them, but failed to get an accurate calculation of upper limit for journald log
> > output. The settings in journald size limits did not seem to be connected to the actual
> > log file sizes on disk which were always quite a bit larger than limits we set.
> >
> > We could not spare a dedicated partition and I did not see the point of setting
> > file system quota limits as journald runs as root.
> >
> > So it would really be nice to have some option to set a hard limit for the
> > on-disk journald output files. A limit on some intermediate log output format is nice
> > and works on server and desktop systems where plenty of read-write storage is available,
> > but for more embedded boxes it wasn't useful.
> >
>
> If you're attempting to confine journals to under 8MiB, it's just not
> going to happen as-is.
>
> You might want to open an RFE issue requesting that the
> FILE_SIZE_INCREASE define in journal-file be runtime configurable,
> and/or clamped by the existing size limits.

Yeah, making this value configurable certainly makes sense. Please
file an RFE issue on github.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel