Re: [FIX] SANE udev rules processing performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 07.12.2020 o 11:25, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On So, 06.12.20 11:13, Marcin Kocur (marcin2006@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

The concern is:
"Recalling #341 (closed), I do have some concerns about efficiency now that
those 650+ USB rules get processed for every non-removal event rather than
only for additions."

If you could answer in the MR comments, that would also be fine:

https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests/541

Sorry for the stupid request, but I'm just a SANE user who tries to fix his
(and everyone's else) scanners. I don't have much knowledge about udev rules
processing performance.
Replied there now.

Lennart


Thanks a thousand! I guess there will be a major rules refactor at some day on  SANE's side...

--
Pozdrawiam / Greetings
Marcin Kocur █

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux