Re: [FIX] SANE udev rules processing performance

[Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On So, 06.12.20 11:13, Marcin Kocur (marcin2006@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> The concern is:
> "Recalling #341 (closed), I do have some concerns about efficiency now that
> those 650+ USB rules get processed for every non-removal event rather than
> only for additions."
>
> If you could answer in the MR comments, that would also be fine:
>
> https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/merge_requests/541
>
> Sorry for the stupid request, but I'm just a SANE user who tries to fix his
> (and everyone's else) scanners. I don't have much knowledge about udev rules
> processing performance.

Replied there now.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel