Re: Memory in systemctl status

[Dave Howorth <systemd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:39:05 +0200
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 28.09.20 um 16:34 schrieb Dave Howorth:
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:10:38 +0200
> > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >> can you stop "reply-all" and breaking threads when respond to
> >> lists?  
> > 
> > I can't answer for the reply-all, that would annoy me as well.
> > But the thread isn't broken, my MUA is showing it nicely.  
> 
> hardly when the off-list copy is faster (and contains no list-headers)
> and i need to reply-all and manually only keep the list because my
> "reply-list" button is gone
> 
> the far slower copy from the list-server is silently purged by
> intention to avoid receive ever ymessage twice on mailing lists where
> people can't handle a MUA

Well then, it's not Benjamin breaking the threading, it's you :P
You need to rewrite your processing rules to prefer the list copy.
Assuming Tbird is capable; else change your MUA.

> anyways, i am more shocked that the only people replyign don#t
> understand the simle fact that "Memory: 500 MB / 8.5 GB (with caches)"
> would make sense but not "Memory: 8.5 GB" as the only RAM dependent
> output _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel