Re: local-fs and remote-fs targets / passive active units

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/5/20 5:27 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
On 5/5/20 5:15 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:

-> this seems to be like an actual run and not only the queuing of a job into the transaction which would be discarded afterwards when the cycle is discovered ?

Ok I figure out this one : I was confusing the systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service from initrd and the one from the actual image.

Still my question about why the cycle

Sorry, I must have been blind : the cycle is obvious.

and the explicit pulling of Before=local-fs.target stands.

This leads me to the initial questions. Sorry for the confusion...

--
TH
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux