Antw: Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?

["Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 09.07.2019 um
10:05
in Nachricht <20190709080527.GK17099@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:49:32AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> It seems "‑‑state=failed" is being ignored silently for "systemctl status"
(in 
> version 228). Is this by design?
> 
> Nope. In 242‑1092+ it seems to work fine.

In v228 is is effective for "list-units", but not for "status"...

> 
> Zbyszek



_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel