Hi! It seems "--state=failed" is being ignored silently for "systemctl status" (in version 228). Is this by design? Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
- From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:49:32 +0200
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
- Prev by Date: Re: systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?
- Next by Date: Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
- Previous by thread: systemd-timedated: Not possible to set time zone that is a symlink!
- Next by thread: Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
- Index(es):
 |