Re: Requires and After

[Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 02.01.19 um 22:09 schrieb James Feeney:
> On 1/2/19 3:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> it's
>> pretty obvious when i REQUIRE something that it should be there when i
>> get started
> 
> Not only is it not "obvious" that "something should be there", it is not true.
> 
> You are confusing "Requires=" and "Requisite=".
> 
> Some developers and some users are not native English speakers. 

tell me what is opaque in case of the word require?

or better tell me a common sense usecase where you require some other
unit but don't care if it was started already and no you can't replace
common sense with documentation justify weird behavior

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel