On 1/2/19 3:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > it's > pretty obvious when i REQUIRE something that it should be there when i > get started Not only is it not "obvious" that "something should be there", it is not true. You are confusing "Requires=" and "Requisite=". Some developers and some users are not native English speakers. In some cases, systemd terminology can be ... less than optimal, while, in other situations, users will simply misunderstand the conventional meaning of words. And, as I mentioned, "Requisite=" is broken in systemd, so that is a different issue. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: Requires and After
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Requires and After
- From: James Feeney <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:09:01 -0700
- In-reply-to: <27b3a80d-cd64-651b-e4df-262e4bc2d803@thelounge.net>
- References: <CAGVGHmvzQpQ2=yGRdUdTGkPPYDjUqW56zPB4HYYw2Q7CUXCe1Q@mail.gmail.com> <461a3518-4413-8eab-13df-99bba1ccfe47@nurealm.net> <179cd21b-99d4-aa5b-6c7a-6c51ed2c3034@thelounge.net> <5ae01819-3085-a26e-5fa9-aa9a2c54cd82@nurealm.net> <27b3a80d-cd64-651b-e4df-262e4bc2d803@thelounge.net>
- Reply-to: james@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.2
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Requires and After
- From: Tom H
- Re: Requires and After
- From: Reindl Harald
- Re: Requires and After
- References:
- Requires and After
- From: Olaf van der Spek
- Re: Requires and After
- From: James Feeney
- Re: Requires and After
- From: Reindl Harald
- Re: Requires and After
- From: James Feeney
- Re: Requires and After
- From: Reindl Harald
- Requires and After
- Prev by Date: Re: Requires and After
- Next by Date: Re: Requires and After
- Previous by thread: Re: Requires and After
- Next by thread: Re: Requires and After
- Index(es):
 |