Am 25.07.2018 um 17:49 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Mi, 25.07.18 17:06, Reindl Harald (h.reindl at thelounge.net) wrote: > >> Am 25.07.2018 um 17:01 schrieb Lennart Poettering: >>> On Mi, 25.07.18 11:23, George Xie (georgexsh at gmail.com) wrote: >>> >>>> thanks for your reply. >>>> >>>> odds enough, on both aforementioned boxes, MemoryAccounting is set >>>> to no: >>> >>> On old systemd versions we'd fill in the account props if the kernel >>> had the data even if MemoryAccounting was not turned on. This has been >>> changed in more recent versions, where all accounting props will >>> report 2^64-1 unless accounting has been turned on for them. >> >> why? >> >> i mean why not just skip that output at all or at least ouput 0 instean >> an arbitary number? > > The dbus property model doesn't know a concept of "unset". And if > something uses 0 memory then this is actually completely valid, it > just means "no memory currently used". We need to be able to > distinguish "no memory" from "i have no information about memory > use" and hence encode the former as 0 and the latter as 2^64-1 (aka > UINT64_MAX, aka (uint64_t) -1) dealing internally with surch arbiatry numbers is still a differnt world than ouput it in a user-tool like "systemctl show" which could simply translate it to some meaningful string no user cares about UINT64_MAX in such outputs