RFC: enable suspend to idle

[grawity@xxxxxxxxx (Mantas Mikulėnas)]

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum at suse.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 10:18 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > But why wouldn't that be a kernel option? I mean, so far the goal was
> > to encode "reasonable defaults" in the kernel itself, so that
> > userspace is only used when those "reasonable defaults" do not apply
> > onto one local case.
> >
> > Really, already for compatibility reasons the kernel should just carry
> > the "reasonable defaults", so that it's not necessary to match it up
> > with a udev version that carries the right policy for it.
>
> Well, no. The kernel must carry conservative defaults that do no harm
> in any case. Setting defaults sensible for the class of systems systemd
> runs on is the job of udev.
>

What would set sensible defaults on systems which don't run systemd nor
udev?

-- 
Mantas MikulÄ?nas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20180309/66555a31/attachment.html>