RFC: enable suspend to idle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote:

>> The kernel must not set policy on what is a source of wake ups. Setting
>> this up so that we do not get a regression in functionality compared
>> to old style S3 (whose policy is in firmware) falls to user space,
>> more specifically udev.
>
> And where would udev have that information from? I mean, if it turns
> this on for all devices, then why can't the kernel do that on its own?


We don't want all devices for which the kernel is supporting wake on idle, to
act as wakeup device.
Ideally this will be a config option with reasonable defaults.
The udev rule should consider this.

Thomas Blume

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5 / D-90409 Nürnberg / Phone: +49-911-740 53 - 0 / VOIP: 3919
GPG 2048R/2CD4D3E8 9A50 048F 1C73 59AA 4D2E  424E B3C6 3FD9 2CD4 D3E8


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux