On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:25:49AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Greg, Greg,
>
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:18 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>
> > > Why? What's wrong with taking the exact specific upstream patches
> > > instead?
> >
> > The exact patch mentioned below ("5686a1e5aa4") will not apply.
> > Too much of the code around it has changed. This does the same
> > thing in the same away taking into account the changes around it.
>
> As the original author of 5686a1e5aa4 ("bus: mvebu: pass the coherency
> availability information at init time"), I can confirm that it will
> clearly not apply as is on 3.10. What Greg Ungerer is proposing here is
> a backport of 5686a1e5aa4 to 3.10.
What about 3.14-stable?
And if this is just a simple backport, that should have been stated
here.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html