Greg, Greg,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:04:18 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > Why? What's wrong with taking the exact specific upstream patches
> > instead?
>
> The exact patch mentioned below ("5686a1e5aa4") will not apply.
> Too much of the code around it has changed. This does the same
> thing in the same away taking into account the changes around it.
As the original author of 5686a1e5aa4 ("bus: mvebu: pass the coherency
availability information at init time"), I can confirm that it will
clearly not apply as is on 3.10. What Greg Ungerer is proposing here is
a backport of 5686a1e5aa4 to 3.10.
The mistake is that 5686a1e5aa4 should have been marked for stable
really.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html