Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:37:25 +0100
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250311131356.GGZ9A3FNOxp32eGAgV@fat_crate.local>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On 03/11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Yap, that fixes the build:
>
> Lemme run randbuilds with that one, see what else breaks with it.

sorry for the off-topic noise, but what about the

	[PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206123207.GA2091@xxxxxxxxxx/

fix for the older binutils? It was acked by Ard.

Should I resend it?

Oleg.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov

References:
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Oleg Nesterov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: Enforce a minimum interrupt polling period
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net v3] qlcnic: fix memory leak issues in qlcnic_sriov_common.c
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]