Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:13:56 +0100
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250311112112.GEZ9AcqM2ceIQVUA0N@fat_crate.local>

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Yap, that fixes the build:

Lemme run randbuilds with that one, see what else breaks with it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Oleg Nesterov

References:
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Oleg Nesterov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Brian Gerst
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Ard Biesheuvel
- Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
  - From: Borislav Petkov

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [arm64/tlb] Fix mmu notifiers for range-based invalidates
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v9] arm64: mm: Populate vmemmap at the page level if not section aligned
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]