Hi!
Le jeudi 10 octobre 2024, 18:11:51 CEST Sherry Yang a écrit :
> > On Oct 9, 2024, at 6:36 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:29:44PM -0700, Sherry Yang wrote:
> >
> >> 5.10.y backported the commit
> >> 09bcf9254838 ("selftests/ftrace: Add new test case which checks non
> >> unique symbol")
which added a new test case to check non-unique symbol.
> >> However, 5.10.y didn't backport the kernel commit
> >> b022f0c7e404 ("tracing/kprobes: Return EADDRNOTAVAIL when func matches
> >> several symbols")to support the functionality from kernel side. Backport
> >> it in this patch series.
> >> The first two patches are presiquisites. The 4th commit is a fix commit
> >> for the 3rd one.
> >
> >
> > Should we just revert the selftest test instead? That seems simpler
> > instead of adding a new feature to this old and obsolete kernel tree,
> > right?
>
>
> Sorry about the confusion. If kprobe attaches a function which is not the
> user wants to attach to, I would say it’s a bug. The test case uncovers the
> bug, so it’s a fix.
> Sherry
>
>
Let me add a bit of context as I wrote the third patch of this set.
It all started with a problem I had when trying to trace symbol names
corresponding to different functions [1].
The patch was accepted to upstream and I wanted to backport it to stables.
Sadly, the patch itself was relying on other patches which were not present in
some stable kernels, which leaded to various problems while releasing the new
stable kernels (once again: sorry about having caused troubles here) [2]...
The current series seems to hold all the patches for the third one to work, so
I guess we can now have it merged to stable without problems.
Best regards.
---
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231018130042.3430f000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2024010402-commerce-variably-ef86@gregkh/
