On October 3, 2024 5:51:07 PM GMT+03:00, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 15:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman ><gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 09:01:09PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> > On October 1, 2024 8:27:55 PM GMT+03:00, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >Hello Greg, >> > > >> > >On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 21:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> > ><gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> > >> >> > >> ------------------ >> > >> >> > >> From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> >> > >> [ Upstream commit ba865bdcc688932980b8e5ec2154eaa33cd4a981 ] >> > >> >> > >> Change the UFS QMP PHY to use newer style of QMP PHY bindings (single >> > >> resource region, no per-PHY subnodes). >> > > >> > >This patch breaks UFS on RB5 - it got caught on the merge with >> > >android14-6.1-lts. >> > > >> > >Could we please revert it? [Also on 5.15.165+ kernels]. >> > >> > Not just this one. All "UFS newer style is bindings" must be reverted from these kernels. >> >> How many got backported? >So far, only this one. Just to note, [1] also needs to be reverted. I'm currently OoO, could you please also handle it? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom?h=linux-6.1.y&id=86225a63467a07047487f37c877277af20a9bf85 > I've sent a revert patch - if you could please >apply it to both 6.1 and 5.15 LTS branches! >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > >Best, >Sumit. -- With best wishes Dmitry
