Re: [PATCH 6.11 397/695] nfsd: fix refcount leak when file is unhashed after being found

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Oct 3, 2024, at 3:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:12:32AM -0400, Youzhong Yang wrote:
>> My understanding is that the following 4 commits together fix the leaking issue:
>> 
>> nfsd: add list_head nf_gc to struct nfsd_file
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8e6e2ffa6569a205f1805cbaeca143b556581da6
>> 
>> nfsd: fix refcount leak when file is unhashed after being found
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8a7926176378460e0d91e02b03f0ff20a8709a60
>> 
>> nfsd: remove unneeded EEXIST error check in nfsd_do_file_acquire
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=81a95c2b1d605743220f28db04b8da13a65c4059
>> 
>> nfsd: count nfsd_file allocations
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=700bb4ff912f954345286e065ff145753a1d5bbe
>> 
>> The first two are essential but it's better to have the last two commits too.
> 
> So right now only the 2nd and 3rd are in the tree, do we really need the
> others as well?  And if so, why were none of these marked for a stable
> inclusion?

IMO 1/4 and 4/4 are not needed in stable, and that's
why we marked them that way.


--
Chuck Lever






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux