Hi Greg,
On 26/08/2024 14:09, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
Thank you for the notification!
(...)
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From 65fb58afa341ad68e71e5c4d816b407e6a683a66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:45:22 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: check re-using ID of closed subflow
>
> This test extends "delete and re-add" to validate the previous commit. A
> new 'subflow' endpoint is added, but the subflow request will be
> rejected. The result is that no subflow will be established from this
> address.
>
> Later, the endpoint is removed and re-added after having cleared the
> firewall rule. Before the previous commit, the client would not have
> been able to create this new subflow.
>
> While at it, extra checks have been added to validate the expected
> numbers of MPJ and RM_ADDR.
>
> The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
> commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
> but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
> ID.
>
> Fixes: b6c08380860b ("mptcp: remove addr and subflow in PM netlink")
For the same reasons as the ones invoked for v5.15, I don't think we
need to backport this patch to v5.10.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
