On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:40:52PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Greg, Sasha,
>
> On 02/09/2024 19:25, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> > commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.
> >
> > After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new
> > subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using
> > previously used IDs.
> >
> > Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to
> > re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.
> >
> > The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
> > commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
> > but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
> > ID.
>
> FYI, Sasha has applied all the patches from this series, except this
> one, the backport of e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for
> flush/re-add endpoints").
>
> In theory, this commit can be applied without any conflicts now that
> commit b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for
> remove/readd") has been queued in v6.10.
Thanks, I've done that right now.
greg k-h
