Hi Greg, Sasha,
On 02/09/2024 19:25, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.
>
> After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new
> subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using
> previously used IDs.
>
> Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to
> re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.
>
> The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
> commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
> but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
> ID.
FYI, Sasha has applied all the patches from this series, except this
one, the backport of e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for
flush/re-add endpoints").
In theory, this commit can be applied without any conflicts now that
commit b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for
remove/readd") has been queued in v6.10.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
