Hi Greg, Sasha, On 02/09/2024 19:25, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: > commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream. > > After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new > subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using > previously used IDs. > > Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to > re-create the subflow that was previously rejected. > > The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous > commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, > but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit > ID. FYI, Sasha has applied all the patches from this series, except this one, the backport of e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints"). In theory, this commit can be applied without any conflicts now that commit b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd") has been queued in v6.10. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.