Re: [PATCH 6.10 090/263] drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the param type of set_power_profile_mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19. 08. 24, 22:12, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
[Public]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 3:54 AM
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander
<Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>; Koenig,
Christian <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>;
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 090/263] drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the param type of
set_power_profile_mode

FTR:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
Ma Jun (Jun.Ma2@xxxxxxx)
The email address you entered couldn't be found

So the author of the patch CANNOT respond. Anyone else?

This was a Coverity fix.  As to why it was pulled into stable, I think Sasha's scripts picked it up.

Sorry, but again, why do we change the kernel to _silence_ Coverity? We do not do this even for compilers.

I am asking, why do you call this a fix at all? What does it fixes?

And finally, Coverity has a "False positive" selection box to dismiss a warning for good. One needs not changing the code.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux