On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 08:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> > Did you also check what order libc uses? I would expect libc on SuperH
>> > misordering the
>> > arguments as well unless I am missing something. Or do we know that the
>> > code is actually
>> > currently broken?
>>
>> Yes, I checked glibc, musl and uclibc-ng for all the cases in
>> which the ABI made no sense, as well as to check that my analysis
>> of the kernel sources matches the expectations of the libc.
>
> OK, awesome.
>
> Will you send a v2 so I can ack the updated version of the patch?
>
> I'm also fine with the patch going through your tree, as I would
> like to start with the changes for v6.11 this week.
I should be able to get a v2 out today and apply that to my
asm-generic tree to have in linux-next before I send the
pull request.
Arnd
