On 01/10/2015 05:26 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > On Friday 09 January 2015 19:57:37 Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 01/09/15 17:54, Simon Wunderlich wrote: >>> Performing spectral scans on 5 GHz channels may result in PHY errors >>> sent by the hardware, even if DFS support is not enabled in the driver >>> (e.g. channel scanning or passive monitoring). In that case channels may >>> falsely get marked as 'unusable'. To fix that, only process radar PHY >>> errors when radar is explicitly enabled in the driver. >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> Not an ath9k expert, but I would think those channels would already be >> marked as unusable, because DFS is disabled in the driver. Or does this >> also affect 5G channels that do not require DFS. >> >> Regards, >> Arend > > Hey Arend, > > maybe that was not really clear, but this is talking about the DFS state > "unusable". By default, channels are marked in DFS state "usable", and after > the clear channel assessment (which is done e.g. when starting AP mode) they > are marked as "available". As soon as radar is detected they are marked as > "unusable". > > These DFS state changes should only happen while there is something operating > with radar enabled, e.g. AP mode. It should not happen if we just have monitor > mode or scan for channels. These channels should then stay in their previous > DFS state (e.g. 'usable'). This was borked and this patch tries to fix it. :) > > Cheers, > Simon > Hi, the issue here is that DFS and spectral use the same PHY_ERROR reporting mechanism, and the dfs module is still in its initial state prior the spectral support was added. With that, feeding the dfs detector with PHY_ERROR frames generated by spectral scanner might cause false radar detections. I did not dig how the hw->conf.radar_enabled flag is set in monitor mode, but if it is same as for master (i.e. set for DFS channels), then it would be a better approach to prevent calling ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr() altogether from ath9k_rx_skb_preprocess() if not set. And while you're at that: slaves do not need to scan for radar, might be worth checking if it makes sense to selectively disable radar detection in STA mode. I am using attached private OpenWRT patch for that - which still would interfere with spectral scanning. Generally, the PHY_ERROR processing should be reworked but becomes quite complicated when you take into account special use-cases. Think of radar events being treated differently depending on whether a master or a monitor detected them (OC-CAC vs. ISM). Cheers, Zefir
>From 089ab0d624d4b6f3a206ea8a81b4a3e061cf3edb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:33:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ath9k: do not enable radar pulse detection in STA mode --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ u32 ath_calcrxfilter(struct ath_softc *s | ATH9K_RX_FILTER_MCAST; /* if operating on a DFS channel, enable radar pulse detection */ - if (sc->hw->conf.radar_enabled) + if (sc->hw->conf.radar_enabled && sc->sc_ah->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) rfilt |= ATH9K_RX_FILTER_PHYRADAR | ATH9K_RX_FILTER_PHYERR; spin_lock_bh(&sc->chan_lock);