Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:55:46AM +0100, Sam James wrote:
>> Is it worth reverting the original bad backport for now, given it causes
>> xfstests failures?
>
> Sounds like a good idea to me, anyone want to submit the revert so we
> can queue it up?

Thanks for the nudge, I wasn't planning on but why not?

6.1: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240614084038.3133260-1-sam@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
6.6: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240614085102.3198934-1-sam@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Hope I've done it right. Cheers.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

thanks,
sam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux