Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork
From: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 05:55:46 +0100
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CACzhbgRjDNkpaQOYsUN+v+jn3E2DVxX0Q4WuQWNjfwEx4Fps6g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Gentoo

Is it worth reverting the original bad backport for now, given it causes
xfstests failures?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork
  - From: Leah Rumancik

Prev by Date: + mm-fix-incorrect-vbq-reference-in-purge_fragmented_block.patch tentatively added to mm-hotfixes-stable branch
Next by Date: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/vmalloc: fix vmalloc which may return null if called with __GFP_NOFAIL
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6.6] backport: fix 6.6 backport of changes to fork
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux