On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 07:02:23PM +0800, shengyong wrote: > > > 在 2014/12/17 14:35, Greg KH 写道: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 06:22:43AM +0000, Sheng Yong wrote: > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> Linux 3.10.y does not support BE8 well, in result, we meet BE8 issues when > >> enabling it. So we hope that these BE8-related patchset can be merged to > >> stable 3.10.y to make BE8 avaliable. > > > > What is "BE8"? > > > > And how is this a bugfix series? It really looks like it is a new > > feature you are asking to be backported here, which isn't ok for stable > > kernels, as is explained in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. > Yes, I agree that BE8 is a feature. Great, patch set now dropped :) > But in the situation that CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN and CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8 > are turned on, this feature makes kernel go wrong. So I'm confused about > whether BE8 is a fix or not? And as I mentioned in the last mail that > commits a2ad9bef and 9f6bb0c2 in 3.10.61 seem trying to fix problems > caused by BE8. So I think BE8 is a problem here. What specific patches went in that you are concerned about here? Perhaps they should not have been applied, and I only did so because there were no conflicts. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html