Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:10:16 -0400
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sashal@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Francis Ginther <francis.ginther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240403180512.GA3411@lst.de>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



On 4/3/24 14:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Hi Joseph.

given that Canonical ignores our kernel licensing rules and tries to
get away with it I'm not going to offer any help to Canonical at all.

Sorry, I was trying to help the community since this is affectingupstream stable kernels.

References:
- [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
  - From: Joseph Salisbury
- Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: [PATCH 6.6 08/11] Revert "workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work()"
Next by Date: [PATCH 6.6 02/11] Revert "workqueue: Dont call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()"
Previous by thread: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
Next by thread: [PATCH 6.8 00/11] 6.8.4-rc1 review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux