Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:05:12 +0200
Cc: hch@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sashal@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Francis Ginther <francis.ginther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <924449dc-9b1f-4943-afe3-a68c03aedbb5@canonical.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Hi Joseph.

given that Canonical ignores our kernel licensing rules and tries to
get away with it I'm not going to offer any help to Canonical at all.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
  - From: Joseph Salisbury

References:
- [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
  - From: Joseph Salisbury

Prev by Date: [PATCH 6.6 01/11] Revert "workqueue: Shorten events_freezable_power_efficient name"
Next by Date: [PATCH 6.6 00/11] 6.6.25-rc1 review
Previous by thread: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
Next by thread: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux