On 3/15/24 8:42 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:14:57AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:40:53PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 3/14/24 4:35 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:04:59PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> On 3/14/24 3:12 PM, Mateusz Jo?czyk wrote: >>>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 22:27, Mateusz Jo?czyk pisze: >>>>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 21:13, Mateusz Jo?czyk pisze: >>>>>>>> W dniu 13.03.2024 o 17:38, Sasha Levin pisze: >>>>>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.82 release. >>>>>>>>> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>>>>>> let me know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Responses should be made by Fri Mar 15 04:39:56 PM UTC 2024. >>>>>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-6.1.y&id2=v6.1.81 >>>>>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y >>>>>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Sasha >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kernel hangs during early boot. No console messages, nothing in pstore. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU (Intel i3-7020U) and Ubuntu 20.04. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This CPU is not affected by RFDS (at least according to the Kconfig message), so I have set >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CONFIG_MITIGATION_RFDS=n >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in Kconfig. I do not have any updated microcode (if any will be provided at all for this CPU). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mateusz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>> >>>>>> Bisected down to >>>>>> >>>>>> commit d3d517a95e83a7d89e1ff511da1a0a31c9234155 >>>>>> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> >>>>>> Date: Fri Feb 3 16:03:54 2023 +0100 >>>>>> >>>>>> blk-rq-qos: make rq_qos_add and rq_qos_del more useful >>>>> >>>>> Do you have: >>>>> >>>>> commit e33b93650fc5364f773985a3e961e24349330d97 >>>>> Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Tue Feb 28 03:16:54 2023 -0800 >>>>> >>>>> blk-iocost: Pass gendisk to ioc_refresh_params >>>>> >>>>> in there? >>>> >>>> It's not in the 6.1 tree, do we need it? >>> >>> If the bisected commit is in there, then yes we need it. It's marked as >>> fixes that, so puzzled why it isn't in there? >> >> Sorry, I take it back - both e33b93650fc5 ("blk-iocost: Pass gendisk to >> ioc_refresh_params") and d3d517a95e83 ("blk-rq-qos: make rq_qos_add and >> rq_qos_del more useful") are currently in the 6.1 tree. I didn't see e33b93650fc5 in there, but maybe it was part of the series that this is about. > I'll go ahead and drop the backport of f814bdda774c ("blk-wbt: Fix > detection of dirty-throttled tasks") as well as the dependencies (which > is where this issue bisected to), and all follow-up fixes. > > We can revisit this for the next release. Sounds reasonable. -- Jens Axboe
