Hello! On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 01:03, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sasha Levin wrote on Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:45:27PM -0400: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release. > > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > Thanks Sasha for submitting a stable rc review! > > If it's not too much trouble, would it be possible to have a different > header in the 00 patch from the other patches for my mailbox? > The mails Greg sends have the X-KernelTest-* headers (patch, tree, > branch etc) only in the cover letter, while all the patches themselves > only have 'X-stable: review' and 'X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore' > > I don't really care much what actual tags are on which as long as > there's a way to differentiate that cover letter from the rest so I can > redirect it to a mailbox I actually read to notice there's a new rc to > test, without having all the patches unless I explicitly look for them. I subscribe to this request. We ran into unexpected issues because all the emails in the series included the same headers as the cover. > If it's difficult I'll add a regex on the subject for ' 00/' or > something, I'd prefer matching only headers for robustness but just let > me know. That's what I ended up doing, and you know the saying: I had this problem and solved it via regexes, now I have two problems. :) FWIW, here's my "problem": '^Subject: \[PATCH\ [456]\.[0-9]+\ 0[0]*\/' Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx
