Sasha Levin wrote on Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:45:27PM -0400: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release. > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Thanks Sasha for submitting a stable rc review! If it's not too much trouble, would it be possible to have a different header in the 00 patch from the other patches for my mailbox? The mails Greg sends have the X-KernelTest-* headers (patch, tree, branch etc) only in the cover letter, while all the patches themselves only have 'X-stable: review' and 'X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore' I don't really care much what actual tags are on which as long as there's a way to differentiate that cover letter from the rest so I can redirect it to a mailbox I actually read to notice there's a new rc to test, without having all the patches unless I explicitly look for them. If it's difficult I'll add a regex on the subject for ' 00/' or something, I'd prefer matching only headers for robustness but just let me know. Didn't run into any problem with the patches themselves: > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.10.y&id2=v5.10.212 > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Tested 0a70dd1e1aa9 ("Linux 5.10.213-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
