On 12/2/2014 10:08 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi Greg & Co,
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 17:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Any reason you sent out 3 copies of this patch series?
Apologies, I asked Sagi to include some pointers for me as to which
patches need to be considered for stable.
Sagi, in the future please add extra info about stable CCs into the
cover-letter instead of using commit tags, and I'll add them in when
merging.
And please go read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt, I don't think
many of these patches in this series are actually relevant for stable
kernels.
The end result of the patches marked as stable here is to address a
number of outstanding issues with active I/O shutdown, especially with
large numbers of active sessions + RDMA ports.
To that end, they will need to be squashed + add more detailed commit
log context to explain what's going on.
Yep, I agree. Lets have thing done properly in 3.19 and deal with
stabling later.
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html