Re: [PATCH] btrfs: don't warn if discard range is not aligned to sector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2024/1/16 06:08, David Sterba wrote:
There's a warning in btrfs_issue_discard() when the range is not aligned
to 512 bytes, originally added in 4d89d377bbb0 ("btrfs:
btrfs_issue_discard ensure offset/length are aligned to sector
boundaries"). We can't do sub-sector writes anyway so the adjustment is
the only thing that we can do and the warning is unnecessary.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.19+
Reported-by: syzbot+4a4f1eba14eb5c3417d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 6d680031211a..8e8cc1111277 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -1260,7 +1260,8 @@ static int btrfs_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, u64 start, u64 len,
  	u64 bytes_left, end;
  	u64 aligned_start = ALIGN(start, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT);

-	if (WARN_ON(start != aligned_start)) {
+	/* Adjust the range to be aligned to 512B sectors if necessary. */
+	if (start != aligned_start) {
  		len -= aligned_start - start;
  		len = round_down(len, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT);
  		start = aligned_start;
Can we do one step further in mkfs and device add, by rounding down the
device size to btrfs sector boundary?

Add maybe output a warning message at mount time when adding one device?

Thanks,
Qu





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux