Re: ASoC: amd: yc: Fix non-functional mic on ASUS E1504FA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 03:44:37PM +0000, Malcolm Hart wrote:
> 
> 
> >From da1e023a39987c1bc2d5b27ecf659d61d9a4724c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: foolishhart <62256078+foolishhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:51:04 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Update acp6x-mach.c
> 
> Added 	ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC  "E1504FA" to quirks file to enable microphone array on ASUS Vivobook GO 15.
> ---
>  sound/soc/amd/yc/acp6x-mach.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 


Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch was attached, please place it inline so that it can be
  applied directly from the email message itself.

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend
  it after adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of
  the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in
  order to properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper
  Subject: line should look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux