On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:48:15AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > Something went wrong with this 5.4 series you sent, I got the following > > emails which look like 2 different versions of this series?: > > > > 11 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (7.0K) [PATCH v5.4.y 1/3] driver: platform: Add helper for safer setting of driver_override > > 12 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (2.6K) ├─>[PATCH v5.4.y 3/3] rpmsg: Fix kfree() of static memory on setting driver_override > > 13 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (1.1K) ├─>[PATCH v5.4.y 2/3] rpmsg: Constify local variable in field store macro > > 14 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (2.6K) ├─>[PATCH v5.4.y 2/2] rpmsg: Fix kfree() of static memory on setting driver_override > > 15 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (1.1K) └─>[PATCH v5.4.y 1/2] rpmsg: Constify local variable in field store macro > > > > And you can see it here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231018120527.2110438-1-lee@xxxxxxxxxx/#r > > > > So I don't know what patches to take for 5.4, sorry. Can you please resend the > > properly ones? > > You're right. They're in my inbox too. > > One set was sent 1s after the other, so must be a tooling error. > > The 2 sets are identical. > > 1/3 == 1/3 > 2/3 == 2/3 > 3/3 == 3/3 You have 1/2 and 2/2 here, so hence my confusion :( All of these need to be resent anyway, let's talk off-list... thanks, greg k-h
