On Fri, 20 Oct 2023, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > <snip> > > Something went wrong with this 5.4 series you sent, I got the following > emails which look like 2 different versions of this series?: > > 11 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (7.0K) [PATCH v5.4.y 1/3] driver: platform: Add helper for safer setting of driver_override > 12 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (2.6K) ├─>[PATCH v5.4.y 3/3] rpmsg: Fix kfree() of static memory on setting driver_override > 13 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (1.1K) ├─>[PATCH v5.4.y 2/3] rpmsg: Constify local variable in field store macro > 14 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (2.6K) ├─>[PATCH v5.4.y 2/2] rpmsg: Fix kfree() of static memory on setting driver_override > 15 C Oct 18 Lee Jones (1.1K) └─>[PATCH v5.4.y 1/2] rpmsg: Constify local variable in field store macro > > And you can see it here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231018120527.2110438-1-lee@xxxxxxxxxx/#r > > So I don't know what patches to take for 5.4, sorry. Can you please resend the > properly ones? You're right. They're in my inbox too. One set was sent 1s after the other, so must be a tooling error. The 2 sets are identical. 1/3 == 1/3 2/3 == 2/3 3/3 == 3/3 -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
