On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:51:42AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > On Mon 2023-10-09 14:59:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.57 release. > > There are 162 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:00:55 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.57-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr > > > > Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper > > > > Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs > > These are rather intrusive, and marked with > > Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write") > > but we don't have that one in 6.1, so we should not have these, > either. Ah, seems we forgot that dep patch, so that's now added which makes more sense why the prep patches were added. thanks, greg k-h
