On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 6:40 AM Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:16 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 07:17:06PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> > > Same issue is possible for extended-lba case also. When user specifies a
> > > short unaligned buffer, the kernel makes a copy and uses that for DMA.
> >
> > I fail to understand the extent LBA case, and also from looking at the
> > code mixing it up with validation of the metadata_len seems very
> > confusion. Can you try to clearly explain it and maybe split it into a
> > separate patch?
>
> The case is for the single interleaved buffer with both data and
> metadata. When the driver sends this buffer to blk_rq_map_user_iov(),
> it may make a copy of it.
> This kernel buffer will be used for DMA rather than user buffer. If
> the user-buffer is short, the kernel buffer is also short.
>
> Does this explanation help?
> I can move the part to a separate patch.
>
> > > Fixes: 456cba386e94 ("nvme: wire-up uring-cmd support for io-passthru on
> char-device")
> >
> > Is this really io_uring specific? I think we also had the same issue
> > before and this should go back to adding metadata support to the
> > general passthrough ioctl?
>
> Yes, not io_uring specific.
> Just that I was not sure on (i) whether to go back that far in
> history, and (ii) what patch to tag.
>
> > > +static inline bool nvme_nlb_in_cdw12(u8 opcode)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (opcode) {
> > > + case nvme_cmd_read:
> > > + case nvme_cmd_write:
> > > + case nvme_cmd_compare:
> > > + case nvme_cmd_zone_append:
> > > + return true;
> > > + }
> > > + return false;
> > > +}
> >
> > Nitpick: I find it nicer to read to have a switch that catches
> > everything with a default statement instead of falling out of it
> > for checks like this. It's not making any different in practice
> > but just reads a little nicer.
>
> Sure, I can change it.
>
What if the ns used the KV CS? Store and retrieve are the same
op codes as nvme_cmd_write and nvme_cmd_read.
> > > + /* Exclude commands that do not have nlb in cdw12 */
> > > + if (!nvme_nlb_in_cdw12(c->common.opcode))
> > > + return true;
> >
> > So we can still get exactly the same corruption for all commands that
> > are not known? That's not a very safe way to deal with the issue..
>
> Given the way things are in NVMe, I do not find a better way.
> Maybe another day for commands that do (or can do) things very
> differently for nlb and PI representation.
>
> > > + control = upper_16_bits(le32_to_cpu(c->common.cdw12));
> > > + /* Exclude when meta transfer from/to host is not done */
> > > + if (control & NVME_RW_PRINFO_PRACT && ns->ms == ns->pi_size)
> > > + return true;
> > > +
> > > + nlb = lower_16_bits(le32_to_cpu(c->common.cdw12));
> >
> > I'd use the rw field of the union and the typed control and length
> > fields to clean this up a bit.
> >
> > > if (bdev && meta_buffer && meta_len) {
> > > + if (!nvme_validate_passthru_meta(ns, nvme_req(req)->cmd,
> > > + meta_len, bufflen)) {
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto out_unmap;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > meta = nvme_add_user_metadata(req, meta_buffer, meta_len,
> >
> > I'd move the check into nvme_add_user_metadata to keep it out of the
> > hot path.
> >
> > FYI: here is what I'd do for the external metadata only case:
>
> Since you have improvised comments too, I may just use this for the
> next iteration.
