The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2023092011-resume-sneezing-595f@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 4ca8e03cf2bf ("btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert") 487781796d30 ("btrfs: make fast fsyncs wait only for writeback") 75b463d2b47a ("btrfs: do not commit logs and transactions during link and rename operations") 260db43cd2f5 ("btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments") 3ef64143a796 ("btrfs: remove no longer used trans_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") cd8d39f4aeb3 ("btrfs: remove no longer used log_list member of struct btrfs_ordered_extent") 7af597433d43 ("btrfs: make full fsyncs always operate on the entire file again") 0a8068a3dd42 ("btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient") da447009a256 ("btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()") a5eeb3d17b97 ("btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item") 95418ed1d107 ("btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync") 3f1c64ce0438 ("btrfs: delete the ordered isize update code") 41a2ee75aab0 ("btrfs: introduce per-inode file extent tree") 236ebc20d9af ("btrfs: fix log context list corruption after rename whiteout error") b5e4ff9d465d ("Btrfs: fix infinite loop during fsync after rename operations") 0e56315ca147 ("Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync when using NO_HOLES") 9c7d3a548331 ("btrfs: move extent_io_tree defs to their own header") 6f0d04f8e72e ("btrfs: separate out the extent io init function") 33ca832fefa5 ("btrfs: separate out the extent leak code") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:59:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for. This means we expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the ordered extent. However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the "ASSERT(trans)" check. This is obviously incorrect, and the code properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist. Fix this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system. CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index b46ab348e8e5..345c449d588c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode, refcount_inc(&trans->use_count); spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock); - ASSERT(trans); + ASSERT(trans || BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info)); if (trans) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trans->pending_ordered)) wake_up(&trans->pending_wait);
