Hi
On 25/08/23 2:18 pm, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:35:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
+ linux-nfs and more
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release.
There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.48-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Following test regression found on stable-rc 6.1.
Rpi4 is using NFS mount rootfs and running LTP syscalls testing.
chown02 tests creating testfile2 on NFS mounted and validating
the functionality and found that it was a failure.
This is already been reported by others on lore and fix patch merged
into stable-rc linux-6.4.y [1] and [2].
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
Odd, it's not a regression in this -rc cycle, so it was missed in the
previous ones somehow?
Test log:
--------
chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile1, 0, 0) passed
chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile2, 0, 0) passed
chown02.c:58: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700, expected 0102700
fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(3, 0, 0) passed
fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(4, 0, 0) passed
fchown02.c:67: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700,
expected 0102700
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.48-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: c079d0dd788ad4fe887ee6349fe89d23d72f7696
* git describe: v6.1.47-16-gc079d0dd788a
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.47-16-gc079d0dd788a
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.46)
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-syscalls
- chown02
- fchown02
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-syscalls
- chown02
- fchown02
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-syscalls
- chown02
- fchown02
Do we need the following patch into stable-rc linux-6.1.y ?
I see from mailing thread discussion, says that
the above commit is backported to LTS kernels -- 5.10.y,5.15.y and 6.1.y.
What "above commit"?
Sorry, s/above/below/
I copied that from another email thread as it is.
And what commit should be backported?
nfsd: use vfs setgid helper
commit 2d8ae8c417db284f598dffb178cc01e7db0f1821 upstream.
I have tried backporting this on 6.1.y and 5.15.y.
Here are the backports. (note: I would like to have them reviewed)
6.1.y:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825161603.371792-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx/
5.15.y:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825161901.371818-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks,
Harshit
Please refer this link,
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20230502-agenda-regeln-04d2573bd0fd@brauner/
confused,
greg k-h
