On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:35:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > + linux-nfs and more > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release. > > > There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.48-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Following test regression found on stable-rc 6.1. > > Rpi4 is using NFS mount rootfs and running LTP syscalls testing. > > chown02 tests creating testfile2 on NFS mounted and validating > > the functionality and found that it was a failure. > > > > This is already been reported by others on lore and fix patch merged > > into stable-rc linux-6.4.y [1] and [2]. > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Odd, it's not a regression in this -rc cycle, so it was missed in the > previous ones somehow? > > > Test log: > > -------- > > chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile1, 0, 0) passed > > chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile2, 0, 0) passed > > chown02.c:58: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700, expected 0102700 > > > > fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(3, 0, 0) passed > > fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(4, 0, 0) passed > > fchown02.c:67: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700, > > expected 0102700 > > > > > > ## Build > > * kernel: 6.1.48-rc1 > > * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc > > * git branch: linux-6.1.y > > * git commit: c079d0dd788ad4fe887ee6349fe89d23d72f7696 > > * git describe: v6.1.47-16-gc079d0dd788a > > * test details: > > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.47-16-gc079d0dd788a > > > > ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.46) > > * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-syscalls > > - chown02 > > - fchown02 > > > > * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-syscalls > > - chown02 > > - fchown02 > > > > * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-syscalls > > - chown02 > > - fchown02 > > > > > > > > > > Do we need the following patch into stable-rc linux-6.1.y ? > > > > I see from mailing thread discussion, says that > > > > the above commit is backported to LTS kernels -- 5.10.y,5.15.y and 6.1.y. > > What "above commit"? Sorry, s/above/below/ I copied that from another email thread as it is. > > And what commit should be backported? nfsd: use vfs setgid helper commit 2d8ae8c417db284f598dffb178cc01e7db0f1821 upstream. Please refer this link, - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20230502-agenda-regeln-04d2573bd0fd@brauner/ > > confused, > > greg k-h
